Public health dashboards are political tools. The numbers at the top become the north star for the system. They shape what leaders are praised for, what gets funded, and what problems are considered urgent. Design a dashboard badly and the right problems stay invisible. Design it well and you can shift what a ministry pays attention to.
In 2018, Resolve to Save Lives partnered with Bangladesh's National Heart Foundation to pilot a national hypertension management program. Around 30 million people in Bangladesh live with high blood pressure. When the program started, only 20% had it under control. As of February 2026, more than 400,000 patients are enrolled and control rates have reached 60%.
This talk traces the dashboard design decisions behind that shift, across three areas.
The first is shared vocabulary. Scientists, bureaucrats, and frontline health workers do not naturally speak the same language of data. Tony's team tested and refined every metric definition and dashboard label until a ministry official could interpret and explain the numbers as confidently as a public health expert.
The second is essential data only. Medical officers in Bangladesh see 100 to 200 patients a day. That is roughly two minutes per patient. Data entry cannot take more than 20 seconds. The talk covers how to decide on the bare minimum needed to monitor program performance without breaking the clinical workflow.
The third is making the invisible visible. A small change in numerator or denominator can completely change what a decision-maker sees, surfacing patients at high risk, identifying likely returnees, catching emerging drug shortages before they become crises.
7.8 million patients across 7 countries are now managed with a nearly identical dashboard. Some countries use it to surface bad numbers transparently. Others tweak definitions to look better. The design is the same. The choices around it are not.